2010 • Islam for U.K • Anjem Choudary • Fareed Zakaria

Fareed begins with confidence of a matador. He posits a question and develops a discussion but Choudary, a trained solicitor, skillfully engages his host in another topic without presenting a lead and then turns around and scores a winner between Fareed’s legs - from behind - and when he is reminded of the confusion of his dribble, he posits a question to Fareed’s initial one making him forget the original discussion. 

Indoctrination does constrain one’s ability to opine but the well-indoctrinated Choudary has the knack to turn babble into seemingly reasoned opinions while force-feeding his bizarre world-view to his audience in one swallow. If not for the constraints of the time-slot, the guest in Choudary would have pinned his wobbling host proper but, if not for the want of political correctness infused in the Left-leaning platform and the doctrinal bias constraining his host (the way Maajid Nawaz of Quilliam Foundation was not in the previous clip against Choudary) the host in Fareed would have pinned his guest good and proper. 

Moral of the story:- Taking a que from Nawaz, if a Muslim who claims to be moderate wishes to win a debate against one who claims to be a true adherent, he (the moderate) has to consciously step out of his 'religious sandals'. 'Apostatizing' for the duration enables a him to bloody a wily adherent.

Words – Tommy Peters

Courtesy of CNN (used without permission)

(Advanced appreciation is rendered for materials used without express permission of copyright owners)

http://tommypetersbicycles.blogspot.com/