A 'YouTube' question for Justin Santiago

-

Justin, you are doing good work. Your blog adds immense value for the man-on-the-street. Expect some bureaucratic nonsense from some bar-council uptight about advertising limitations and such but for our sakes, please stay the course.

I have a question about YouTube and copyright infringement. At what point does Satriani relinquish control of his work! His live performance at Anaheim 2006 is ‘downloadable’ from YouTube not only via Websatch, his YouTube page, but also through accounts of his fans.

It is reasonable to assume that it is illegal to take and use what you have not paid for or what you do not have permission from the owner to take. For all intent, it is ‘theft’ - synonymously known as ‘download’ in the digital platform.

The video depicts One Robot’s Dream, a track I ‘stole’ via the relevant algorithm in Safari’s Activity Window. Safari is one browser that makes the algorithm route possible but that is another issue.

Observe the quality of the video. All tracks of his LIVE album are ‘viewable’ in such clarity. Point is, they are ‘downloadable’ as well, given one could stitch and use the whole album without permission from the artist or copyright owners.

You mentioned the Digital Millennium Copyright Act that protects web services by limiting liability when clientele are found guilty of copyright violation, but does DMCA or any legislation address the niggle - Without express permission of owners, is YouTube abetting theft by hosting copyrights and then enabling downloads of its content?

Easter cheers, Tommy

Joe Satriani - performing One Robot's Dream© at The Grove, Anaheim (2006)

Comments

  1. Justin SantiagoApril 12, 2009 at 10:18 PM

    Hi Tom I've tried to answer your question here at
    http://justin-santiago.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tommy PetersApril 12, 2009 at 10:49 PM

    Justin, thank you for your response "..In conclusion downloading is to be viewed synonymously with theft if the object of the download was to usurp the rights of the copyright owner. Artists like Satriani and his record company are forced to accept the fact that sites like YouTube are a means to reach an audience as wide as possible but at the same time allow for easy downloading, a feature that can be easily disabled by YouTube.."

    The mock download was indeed done to usurp, to take and use without permission, to steal without paying. YouTube abets by not disabling the 'take and use' feature. At this point, with the 'safe harbor' helping out, owners have to toss between marketing their product and loss through theft.

    Cheers, Tommy

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Exchange Stabilization Fund, explained • Eric deCarbonnel

-
Image
Exchange Stabilization Fund (Parts 1 to 4) •... by 1tommypeters1 Exchange Stabilization Fund (Part 5) • Eric... by 1tommypeters1 Bullet points summarized by The Daily Bell • The Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF) was created (without oversight) by Congress in the 1930s to ensure support of the Dollar. It has done a lousy job of what it was supposed to do, as the Dollar has lost almost all its value. • The ESF was put in the hands of the head of the US Treasury and the US Treasurer has absolute power to do what he wants with the fund. • As a result, the ESF has acted as a giant slush fund that has funded the growth of the American Empire over the past century against the will of both Congress and many bankers in private industry. • The ESF effectively runs the US Federal Reserve and tells the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Fed) what to do. It does this because it is responsible for stabilizing the dollar and implementing policies that are in the national inte
Read more

Music Industry Exposed • ©2010 FarhanKhan

-
Image
Music Industry Exposed (Parts 1-4) • ©2010 Farhank by 1tommypeters1 Music Industry Exposed (Parts 5-8) • ©2010 Farhank by 1tommypeters1 Music Industry Exposed (Parts 9-11) • ©2010... by 1tommypeters1 If Passion is the Mother of Eloquence, the eloquence of Farhan and friends emanate with a passion that 'illuminates' a 11-part documentary towards a topic that  surreptitiously feeds the womb, rather than regenerate the soul. While it's safe to assume that Farhan and friends are not on Rihanna's Christmas card list, they are definitely on mine and I hope they progress the arrested narrative to its logical conclusion. All 11 parts are posted above without express permission.  Words - Tommy Peters The quote in the preamble is attributed to Dennis Prager and the comments appended below are re-posted from AboveTopSecret.com that hosted the documentary in 2010. Comments ‘against’ the exposure. “The videos themselves explain that without an inte
Read more

The Sabah - Sulu timeline: 1405 to 2022

-
Image
  The Sabah - Sulu timeline: 1405 to 2022 1405 Sulu sultanate is founded.  1521 Sulu sultanate is colonised under the Spanish empire.  1640           Spanish empire grants the Sulu sultanate independence. 1658 Brunei sultan cedes North Borneo (Sabah) to the Sulu sultan, Mohammad  Jamalul Al Alam, in gratitude for the latter's role in suppressing a revolt against the former. 1878 Sulu sultan “grant and cedes” Sabah to the British North Borneo Co. for 5000.00 dollars per annum. The whole article.   Tommy Peters  August 2, 2022.
Read more